<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tudor Cottage Design Featured in The Oregonian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alamedahistory.org/2009/07/11/english-cottage-design-featured-in-the-oregonian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alamedahistory.org/2009/07/11/english-cottage-design-featured-in-the-oregonian/</link>
	<description>Connecting Past and Present in Northeast Portland&#039;s Historic Homes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:21:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Hawley</title>
		<link>http://alamedahistory.org/2009/07/11/english-cottage-design-featured-in-the-oregonian/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Hawley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alamedahistory.org/?p=563#comment-1163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m all for infill, and all for skinny houses. I live in Sabin, where the original housing stock is generally not as fine as what was built in Alameda, but regardless of whether the house to either side is a 600-square-foot tumbledown Queen Anne or a perfect large bungalow, I&#039;d just as soon not see more of the same in the vacant spot in between.

We have amazing opportunities with infill to incorporate new architectural ideas and building methods. I&#039;m always sorry to see a brand-new slavish imitation of some old style.

Something is lost with infill and increased density, there&#039;s no doubt about it; to my mind, however, what&#039;s lost may be overdue to go away: resource-hungry yards, inefficient houses, and a &quot;country squire in the city&quot; aesthetic that&#039;s not valid for our times. 

There are several wonderful mid-century modern houses along Alameda Ridge that must have once shocked and dismayed the neighbors, but over time, everyone seems to have moved on. I&#039;m sure it will happen again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for infill, and all for skinny houses. I live in Sabin, where the original housing stock is generally not as fine as what was built in Alameda, but regardless of whether the house to either side is a 600-square-foot tumbledown Queen Anne or a perfect large bungalow, I&#8217;d just as soon not see more of the same in the vacant spot in between.</p>
<p>We have amazing opportunities with infill to incorporate new architectural ideas and building methods. I&#8217;m always sorry to see a brand-new slavish imitation of some old style.</p>
<p>Something is lost with infill and increased density, there&#8217;s no doubt about it; to my mind, however, what&#8217;s lost may be overdue to go away: resource-hungry yards, inefficient houses, and a &#8220;country squire in the city&#8221; aesthetic that&#8217;s not valid for our times. </p>
<p>There are several wonderful mid-century modern houses along Alameda Ridge that must have once shocked and dismayed the neighbors, but over time, everyone seems to have moved on. I&#8217;m sure it will happen again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://alamedahistory.org/2009/07/11/english-cottage-design-featured-in-the-oregonian/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alamedahistory.org/?p=563#comment-1162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Shirley: The lot at the corner of NE 29th and Fremont was a vacant lot (which still sported some nice roses until recently) up til a year or 18 months ago, when it was partitioned off and the city approved the &quot;skinny house&quot; design for that spot. I&#039;ve watched construction closely and can only agree that the neighbors must not be very happy, particularly the house to the east. Another example of a skinny house (a wide side yard lost to development) is on the east side of NE 22nd between Fremont and Klickitat. Go have a look at that. Would be interested to hear what other readers feel about the infill development trend in Northeast neighborhoods...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shirley: The lot at the corner of NE 29th and Fremont was a vacant lot (which still sported some nice roses until recently) up til a year or 18 months ago, when it was partitioned off and the city approved the &#8220;skinny house&#8221; design for that spot. I&#8217;ve watched construction closely and can only agree that the neighbors must not be very happy, particularly the house to the east. Another example of a skinny house (a wide side yard lost to development) is on the east side of NE 22nd between Fremont and Klickitat. Go have a look at that. Would be interested to hear what other readers feel about the infill development trend in Northeast neighborhoods&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://alamedahistory.org/2009/07/11/english-cottage-design-featured-in-the-oregonian/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shirley Gibbons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alamedahistory.org/?p=563#comment-1160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Going west on NE Fremont the other day, I noticed a new construction at the intersection across from Alameda School. Is that a re-do or a tear down?  It&#039;s different; I&#039;m sure not very popular with the neighbors. I remember that property as having the prize rose beds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going west on NE Fremont the other day, I noticed a new construction at the intersection across from Alameda School. Is that a re-do or a tear down?  It&#8217;s different; I&#8217;m sure not very popular with the neighbors. I remember that property as having the prize rose beds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

